Showing posts with label should. Show all posts
Showing posts with label should. Show all posts

Sunday, January 29, 2017

Should Google Sell Chromebooks in the Philippines

Should Google Sell Chromebooks in the Philippines

Netbooks are dead, and this time it is for real. Asus and Acer, the last two holdouts, have officially announced that they will stop production of their Eee PC and Aspire One netbooks in 2013. Netbooks have been good sellers in the Philippines, and other developing countries because of their low cost, while having large storage and good productivity. These netbooks with started their life priced at the Php20K to Php30K price range, gradually came down in price to cover the Php10 to Php18K price ranges. In a way, they are not as necessary today. You can get a decent 11-inch to 14-inch laptop today for a little over Php18,000.


But is a way, netbooks are not dead. Both Samsung and Acer produce Google Chromebooks. Chromebooks are literally netbooks. The Chromebook is literally the new netbook. These Chromebooks are powered by Google Chrome operating system. Basically, it is a operating system which really only includes the Google Chrome browser. What makes the interesting, is they cost a lot less. The Acer C7 Chromebook retails for US$199, so it would be a Php10K or so laptop. The Samsung Chromebook retails for US$249 for the WiFi only model, so about Php12-13K.

If you want to see what this is like, you can try using your current PC using only the Chrome Browser. You can download the apps you need from the Chrome Webstore. 



Apps you download will appear in your browser or when you open a new tab.


To create documents, spreadsheets and presentations, you can use Google Docs and should have no problem reading and creating Microsoft Office compatible formats.


Earlier, I said this is literally a "Netbook". For the most part it needs an active internet connection to work. I have not tried all the apps in the Chrome Webstore, so I cannot say all of them need an active internet connection to work, but for the most part at least they do.

As far as I can tell offline capabilities are limited to creating documents and GMail, which will both work offline. Email you create and send while offline will be sent next time you have an internet connection. For me that is enough for my everyday work. Those who do a lot of spreadsheets and presentations may find all this limiting. 

One issue I have is photo-editing. There are several photo editors available, and I like Pixlr Editor. In order to edit a photo, you have to upload the picture to edit it.


So basically, these Chromebooks have good functionality online, and rather limited offline functionality. 

On the one hand, limited internet access in developing countries would mean that these Chromebooks would not be useful to many. On the other hand, I rarely use an computer these days unless I have internet access.

What might I do offline? I prepare documents and spreadsheets. I edit photos. I really have no other user for my laptop offline.

I think the Google Docs needs to get spreadsheets and presentation to work in offline mode too. Chrome OS really needs an offline photo editor. 

Should Google sell Chromebooks in the Philippines and other developing countries? On the one hand they are cheap, and cheap laptops are useful in developing countries. On the other hand, they have limited functionality for those who do not have an internet connection handy at home and other places they frequent.

Me, I want one. 

Go to link Download

Read more »

Tuesday, November 1, 2016

Should I stay or should I go

Should I stay or should I go

Having used my D200 over the last wedding season, Id have to say that we didnt exactly bond together. Why? I dont know. Cant explain it at all really. We should have gotten along swimmingly (as they say), since its very similar to the D300 - and I loved the D300. But the D200 and I ... - not so much.

Maybe it was too much of a change after the disappointment of drowning my Canon 5D? Maybe it just wasnt quite up to the standard of the D300? Or maybe it was just one of those seasons? There were good weddings, but there were no really great weddings (except maybe one). And thats my fault as much as anyone elses, but there it is. The D200 and me just didnt hit it off.

So what to do? Well, I havent shot a wedding in a few months, the new season isnt starting for a few months, and so its that time of year again. The time of year when I review my gear, and decide what stays and what goes.

And not surprisingly, the D200 is going.

But then again, so is a lot of the gear that I bought, not that long ago. Tokina 12-24mm f2.8 - gone. Nikkor 60mm Micro - gone. Nikkor 70-300mm ED - gone. Rokinon 85mm f1.4 - gone. Yonguo 565EX flash - gone (and good ridance!).

Blimey! What exactly am I keeping? Well, not much by the looks of that. Im keeping the Nikkor 18-70mm f3.5/4.5 lens and SB600 flashgun. And thats it. So yes, Im sticking with Nikon.

Although sticking with Nikon wasnt an easy decision, and I was only swayed in the end by a too-good-to-miss kind of a deal on Trademe.

Ive been considering finishing up the wedding photography, and have found this decision (although not yet made completely) actually quite freeing. It made me stop and ask myself, "If i wasnt having to turn up to shoot such and such a client, to take such and such a shot, then what kind of gear would I be happy to shoot with?" With this question in mind, I seriously began to look at some of the Sony cameras. And in as much as they sound like whiz bang amazing bodies (10fps for crying out loud), I just couldnt quite get over the electronic viewfinder in the newer SLT series of bodies. So its a no to the Sonys.

So then I thought I might go full frame again and soot all primes. Oh how very art-school trendy of me. But I didnt want to go back to a Canon 5D (too many painful, wet memories), and cant really afford a 5D MkII or MkIII - so full frame was also out. Ive never really had a problem with cropped sensor cameras anyway. I flaunted with the Canon 40D and 50D for a while - and almost bought a 40D, but the shutter counts were pretty high on most of them.

I downloaded all of the brochures, read all of the reviews, and finally decided that if I got top dollar for my other gear, and really stretched my budget, I could get a new Nikon D7000 and Id be sorted. in many ways its a bit more camera than I actually need, but Im future-proofing myself, right? This camera will see me through for the next five or six years :-)

And then I saw it. At a price I couldnt really refuse. A Nikon D90 - the venerable D90. On Trademe, hardly used (only 1000 shots on the clock), with a 50mm f1.8 amd 18-105mm VR, for a LOT less than a D7000 was going to cost me - body only! I couldnt help myself. And I know Ive made the right decision (read my last post).


In terms of digital cameras, the D90 is practically Methuselah-like! It was first released in 2008 and was the first DSL to have video capabilities. But trust me, I did NOT buy the D90 for its video!

When I looked at the spec sheets, between it and the D7000, I decided that the D7000 didnt bring anything else to the table that was worth spending the extra $$$ on. 12MP is more than enough for me - dont need 16. Likewise, 4.5fps is fine as well - dont need 6. Autofocus isnt an issue either - I always default to the central focus point 99% of the time no matter what camera Im using. And on it goes. Feature after feature, I decided that the D90 was more than enough camera for me - no matter what I was wanting to do with it.

So Im sticking with Nikon, Im waiting patiently (not) for the arrival of my new D90, and Im looking forward to actually spending a lot of time with this camera. I think it might be finally time for me to settle down with one system for a while. Will wonders never cease!?

Go to link Download

Read more »